|
|
Welcome to the ProSoundWeb sound reinforcement forums, home of more than 50,000 audio professionals. Important Notice: Full Names are required in the forum; please put your full name in the alias field in your profile. Sign up for the PSW Product Showcase newsletter!
|
|
Forum Home » Sound Reinforcement » Product Reviews: Sound Reinforcement » JTR Growler vs. EAW LA400: Review
| JTR Growler vs. EAW LA400: Review [message #304883] |
Fri, 21 March 2008 14:14  |
 |
Phil Lewandowski Messages: 237 Registered: March 2007 Location: Cleveland, OH |
Has No Life |
|
|
Hey Everyone!
Since I had recently gotten a hold of a 2008 version of JTR's Growler, I have had a lot of requests to compare it to the EAW LA400 that I have owned for a while now. This has been for several reasons including that they are both 12" horn-loaded designs. They are both portable subs and decently smaller sized. It would be a good thing to note, right now, though that the Growler is almost exaclty half the cubic size of the LA400, so that Growler is in fact a very good amount smaller in size and weights 27 lbs. lighter. (I was actually able to load the Growler into my Suburban, decently easy, when loading out by myself. Something that I don't plan to keep doing as I want to save my back!)
As a note the specific Growler I have is the 2008 model, with plastic corners removed, and 4 casters installed. I am comparing a single to single of each.
First I will copy part of an e-mail that I wrote to Jeff, because he was interested in how my gig went with the sub and comparing it to the LA400:
"It went excellent, especially the sound of it all! It was in a smallish-medium size ballroom, and I would have to say that I was impressed because this was the first time I heard the Growler outside of the controlled environment of the sub shootout and my "shop" (ie: my house!). Given, I was impressed by the room's fairly warm acoustics too.
When I had it centered in front of the stage it made me laugh how awkward it almost looked because I was used to the larger size of the LA400. It looked really mini! Actually when loading it up, my dad who just helped me load it up in the truck was impressed by its size and said it was very manageable compared to the LA400. I powered it off of a RMX1850 bridged which worked very nicely, crossed at 86hz, Butterworth 24 db/octave. I also had it reversed polarity to the tops which has worked very well. I didn't get a chance to work with any delay times but I didn't want to get to much into that because since the tops where not right on top of it.
I didn't even push it that much during the night and I noticed as a single it was already able to keep up with the tops better than the LA400 could. It was also noticeably warmer and smoother sound. I think that much of this is attributed to its smooth response, and its smoothness was also noted at the Maryland sub "party". I again seemed to be able to notice that little extra lower frequencies that I didn't think I would be able to tell from the LA400. I think that the Growler is a decent amount more efficient than the LA400 in that 40-50hz range and it really showed. I was able to get the punch out of it I wanted and now I am just excited to purchase that friend for it and really get them pounding!! Having no plastic corners seemed to help it stay in place very nicely. That best part is 2 of them will equal the same volume as the single LA400! In all, I like the LA400 a lot, but for my size I would rather take 4 Growlers than 2 LA400's that will barely fit in the truck!
After the night, a guy from a medium sized local sound company came up to me. (He was running a distributed system for the auctioneer that was there earlier.) As I was loading out, he asked if I had built that horn loaded sub. I had told him I hadn't and told him about your company and how the Growler is a popular sub on PSW. He seemed impressed and something about it must have struck him, that impressed him, which made me impressed because I had never had anyone come up to me about any of my gear before, like that."
In all, I am excited to take the LA400 outside when it gets nicer up here in Cleveland, and be able to measure it, because I really have been curious where EAW got the 107db sensitivity from.
The thing that really impresses me is how Jeff designed a horn-loaded sub that was that small and still achieves a -3 point of ~42hz, accurate reproduction, and a 130db real-world musical SPL point!
Here is a break down of what I thought:
Sound: I would have to say that the Growler does win this one. It has a smoother sound than the LA400, though the LA400 doesn't lose by much! The Growler also seems to just have that slightly more content and "oomph" behind it for lack of a better word.
Output: Right now the Growler is the winner in this category. The reason for this is that for the 1.5 years I owned the LA400 there were many times I was pushing it I would have to have the peaks go into clipping on the amp to keep it where I needed it. I did not come even close to this problem with the Growler. I will have to listen to the Growler in different environments though coming up, which is why I there is a good chance I may be updating this review in the coming months. The other thing I noted it that there is a noticeable more output in the 40hz-50hz in the Growler.
Size vs. Output: Obvious winner now is the Growler. Just is very impressive in how it is able to achieve the level it does at its small size.
To conclude, I am very excited to be able to carry 4 of these around someday because I am sure they will be able to put out some decent low end for the type of shows I do! All this being said the Growler and LA400 are both very nice subs. I think it really shows that the LA400 needs that partner as many have noted, and the Growler is able to perform decently as a single. I do like the LA400, I do believe that the Growler is just a 1/2 step above it and what makes it even better is the 1/2 size of it to the LA400, so that a small sound company owner like me can carry around 4 in a small truck!
Thanks Much Jeff for a great product and support and thank to Evan for hosting the shootout and making my decision that much easier!
Take Care!
Phil Lewandowski
[Updated on: Fri, 21 March 2008 14:15] "It is good to be Alive!!!"
|
|
| |
| Re: JTR Growler vs. EAW LA400: Review [message #305348 is a reply to message #305295 ] |
Sun, 23 March 2008 08:23   |
 |
Phil Lewandowski Messages: 237 Registered: March 2007 Location: Cleveland, OH |
Has No Life |
|
|
| Bob Kenton wrote on Sat, 22 March 2008 23:04 | Nice review. Can you take a couple of pic's of the sub? While I have seen pic's of the sub I havent seen one with the castors. Are these factory mounted or something that you did?
Thanks.
|
Hey!
Thanks! The T-Nuts were installed free of charge by Jeff when he made the special order for me. Mike Pyle and I had talked about different pattern sizes and we decided on one. I then just simply installed the casters that I bought from Mike!
Thanks!
Phil
[Updated on: Sun, 23 March 2008 13:47] "It is good to be Alive!!!"
|
|
|
| Re: JTR Growler vs. EAW LA400: Review [message #305405 is a reply to message #305295 ] |
Sun, 23 March 2008 12:56   |
 |
Mike Pyle Messages: 1665 Registered: April 2004 Location: Napa, CA |
Has No Life |
|
|
Bob,
Jeff will install the T nuts, and so far has been doing it on a case-by-case basis using the customer's specified mounting pattern. I'm encouraging him to adopt the pattern that Phil got as standard, which fits the 3 1/2" and 4" Guitel casters that are found on many pro audio mfgrs. cabinets and cases. The wheels on Phil's sub are 3 1/2" Guitel like the LA400 uses.
Mike Pyle
Audiopyle Sound
Dealer for Yorkville, Allen & Heath, APB Dynasonics, QSC, RCF, KV2, FBT, JTR, Danley,
Audix, SLS Audio, Genie, RoadReady, K&M, Ultimate, Global Truss, DENON, Elation...
707-315-6204
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| Re: JTR Growler vs. EAW LA400: Review [message #316453 is a reply to message #316439 ] |
Fri, 25 April 2008 12:31   |
 |
Phil Lewandowski Messages: 237 Registered: March 2007 Location: Cleveland, OH |
Has No Life |
|
|
| Travis Riddle wrote on Fri, 25 April 2008 13:10 | so just when i decided to get 4 more LA400s, i read this post...
|
Don't worry, Travis! I have been following along your thread. I think you did the right thing in your situation!
They are both very good subs! They both have things that one might be one up on the other in one way, but then the other might be one up in another way!
The big deciding factor was size! Since I believe, yours is an install the LA400s are fine!
I do believe that, with the stock driver for the LA400, the LA400 may have just a slight bit more peak output, which is good for your situation, but then again the Growler has a slight bit more lower extension either way!
Get those 8 LA400s coupled and powered by 2 MA5000's and you will be able to put out some serious low end, and don't look back!
Take Care!
Phil Lewandowski
[Updated on: Fri, 25 April 2008 12:32] "It is good to be Alive!!!"
|
|
| |
| Re: JTR Growler vs. EAW LA400: Review [message #316469 is a reply to message #316463 ] |
Fri, 25 April 2008 13:01   |
 |
Phil Lewandowski Messages: 237 Registered: March 2007 Location: Cleveland, OH |
Has No Life |
|
|
| Travis Riddle wrote on Fri, 25 April 2008 13:46 |
i am goin to be in a little bit of a situation with room though...can i stack the LA400s on their sides without having any problems??
|
Absolutely!
That is the most popular way to stack subs like this. You would make a 2x2 cluster, with all four of the horns towards the center for the best coupling.
If you had even more room and the center was open for clustering, that would be the best. Center up all 8 and do a 4 high by 2 wide cluster. I have a feeling there isn't room for this though!
Clusters of 2x2 on either side should work fine!
Here is a pic of the standard way to stack 4 horn-loaded subs:
http://srforums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/m/265152/28597/0// /17756/#msg_265152
Take Care!
Phil Lewandowski
[Updated on: Fri, 25 April 2008 13:07] "It is good to be Alive!!!"
|
|
| |
| Re: JTR Growler vs. EAW LA400: Review: Measurement Data [message #317029 is a reply to message #316477 ] |
Sun, 27 April 2008 14:48   |
 |
Phil Lewandowski Messages: 237 Registered: March 2007 Location: Cleveland, OH |
Has No Life |
|
|
Hey!
Now that the weather up here in Cleveland niced up for me!! I was finally able to get outside and take some 1/2 space free air measurements on both the LA400 and the Growler!
As a forewarning: These are not scientific by any means but I do think it really opens my eye to what EAW was measuring and I was impressed by how repeatable Jeff's data is on the Growler. This was a very nice and fun learning experience so any advice is welcome!
My method:
I placed the sub in an open field on my property. I measured 1 meter away from the sub pointed at it, on the ground. The SPL meter was on slow response C-weighted.
I kept the sub not in use far away from the one being tested.
I used a QSC RMX1850HD to power both. Both on channel one, switching from one to the other when each was tested one at a time.
I fed a sine wave using Adobe Audition on a MacBook. I used a volt meter and used a sine wave to get an output voltage from the amp of 2.83 volts. (I just trusted that they are both nominally 8 ohms.) Of course, I didn't run it trough any processing. I didn't use a DSP either just to eliminate any chance of a variable.
I went through starting at 150hz going down in increments of 10hz to 100hz. Then at 100hz down to 35hz I measure in increments of 5hz.
Here is what I found:
EAW LA400
It really enlightened me on where EAW got the sensitivity of 107dB. It seemed like they got it around 150hz. Which, I don't know many, if any live sound comps that cross there subs over that high! So the rating is really irrelevant! What I found is that the sensitivity in the range where the sub would be operating is something more like 102dB 1W/1M. Which puts the -3dB point at about 50hz and the -10 point at about 40hz. At least EAW seemed to get th -10dB point right on the spec sheet. Although it isn't -10 from 107dB. So the lowest usable frequency from this sub seems to be in the 45hz-50hz range and I think you can really hear that when listening!
JTR Growler:
This was very interesting because I believe for a spec sheet to be of use, the data should be repeatable. I was impressed by the "repeatableness" of Jeff's +-1dB from 110 to 46hz claim! (Especially with my setup) Also his -1 point was spot on with what I measured! When I asked Jeff about PEQ settings he said there was a hump around 140hz that I found. But he said, that I shouldn't have to bother with that since I am crossing the subs over much lower than that.
I did find the -3 point to be about 44-43hz and the -10 point to be 36-37hz range. The sensitivity was right where Jeff puts it @ 100-101dB 1W/1M.
So, I definitely give a big kudos to Jeff on really accurate repeatable data!
In all, I hope this helps some people who wanted to see some real data on the 2 subs! Again, this was a learning experience for me and I loved it!
Thanks & Take Care!
Phil Lewandowski
P.S. I am trying to figure out how to get everyone to be able to download the Exel file with all the measurements, since I can't attach it here! For now I will just make a make-shift table!
It doesn't format well but the 1st column is the frequency, 2nd is the SPL of LA400 and 3rd is SPL of Growler.
HZ LA400 Growler
150 107 103
140 106 107
130 106 107
120 106 104
110 106 101
100 106 100
95 105 100
90 105 100
85 105 100
80 105 101
75 104 101
70 104 101
65 103 101
60 103 101
55 101 101
50 99 101
45 96 98
40 92 93
35 88 87
30 N/A 81
[Updated on: Sun, 27 April 2008 14:58] "It is good to be Alive!!!"
|
|
|
| Pages (2): [1 ] |
 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Jul 6 02:53:21 CDT 2008
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01784 seconds |
|